Temporal range: Early Paleocene - Present, 61.7–0 Ma
Indian Palm Squirrel Portrait
Indian palm squirrel (Funambulus palmarum)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Clade: Epitheria
Clade: Boreoeutheria
Superorder: Euarchontoglires
Order: Rodentia
Bowdich, 1821


File:Rodent range.png
Combined range of all rodent species

Rodentia is the order of mammals known as rodents, characterised by a single pair of continuously growing incisors in each of the upper and lower jaws which must be kept short by gnawing.[1][2]

Forty percent of mammal species are rodents, and they are found in vast numbers on all continents other than Antarctica. Common rodents include mice, rats, squirrels, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, and hamsters.[1] Rodents use their sharp incisors to gnaw wood, break into food, and bite predators. Most rodents eat seeds or plants, though some have more varied diets. Some species have historically been pests, eating seeds stored by people[3] and spreading disease.[4]

Size and range of order

In terms of number of species—although not necessarily in terms of number of organisms (population) or biomass—rodents make up the largest order of mammals. With about 2,277 species of rodents (Wilson and Reeder, 2005), over 40% of mammalian species belong to the order.[5] Their success is probably due to their small size, short breeding cycle, and ability to gnaw and eat a wide variety of foods.[6]

Members of non-rodent orders, such as Chiroptera (bats), Scandentia (treeshrews), Soricomorpha (shrews and moles), Lagomorpha (hares, rabbits and pikas) and mustelid carnivores such as weasels and mink, are sometimes confused with rodents.Template:Cn

Rodents are found in vast numbers on all continents except Antarctica, most islands, and in all habitats except oceans. They are the only nonvolant, non-marine placental order—and in particular are the only placental order besides bats and pinnipeds—to have reached Australia without human introduction.



File:Gnagarnas tandsystem, Nordisk familjebok.png
Nearly all rodents share the characteristic of dentition highly specialized for gnawing. This specialization gives rodents their name from the Latin, rodere, to gnaw.[7][8] All rodents, except Paucidentomys vermidax, have a single pair of upper and a single pair of lower incisors, followed by a gap (diastema), and then one or more molars or premolars; Paucidentomys vermidax is unique among the rodents in that it possesses no molars or premolars, and its incisors are so specialsed, they are not for gnawing.[9]

Typical rodent incisors grow continuously and must be kept worn down by gnawing. Their anterior and lateral surfaces are covered with enamel, but the posterior surface is exposed dentine. During gnawing, the incisors grind against each other, wearing away the softer dentine, leaving the enamel edge as the blade of a chisel.[10] This ‘self-sharpening’ system is very effective and is one of the keys to the enormous success of rodents.[11] Rodents lack canines, and have a diastema between their incisors and premolars. They use their teeth for cutting wood, biting through the skin of fruit, or for defense. Nearly all rodents feed on plants, seeds in particular, but a few exceptions eat insects (grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leucogaster) or fish. Some squirrels are known to eat passerine birds, such as cardinals and blue jays. One species, Paucidentomys vermidax, feeds primarily on worms and lacks the ability to gnaw or even chew, possessing bladelike, forked upper incisors and no molars.[12][9]



The capybara, the largest living rodent, can weigh up to 91 kg (201 lb).

Many rodents are small; the tiny African pygmy mouse, Mus minutoides, can be as small as 6 cm (2.4 in) in length and 7 g (0.25 oz) in weight at maturity, and the Baluchistan pygmy jerboa, Salpingotulus michaelis, is of roughly similar or slightly smaller dimensions. On the other hand, the largest extant rodent, the capybara, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, usually weighs up to 65 kg (143 lb), with exceptional specimens weighing up to 91 kg (201 lb).[13] Several enormous rodents are known from the fossil record, the largest known being Josephoartigasia monesi, which is estimated to have typically weighed about 1,000 kg (2,200 lb), and possibly up to 1,534 kg (3,382 lb)[14] or 2,586 kg (5,701 lb) in large individuals.[15]

Ecology and use by humans

Rodents are important in many ecosystems because they reproduce rapidly, and can function as food sources for predators, mechanisms for seed dispersal, and disease vectors. Humans use rodents as a source of fur, as pets, as model organisms in animal testing, for food, and even for detecting land mines.[16] Due to the wide diversity of their characteristics, some of which are considered uncommon or unique amongst mammals, rodents are used widely in research.[17] For example, the naked mole rat, Heterocephalus glaber, is the only known mammal that is poikilothermic and also does not produce the neurotransmitter substance P; it is therefore used in studies on thermoregulation and pain.


File:Masillamys Senckenberg 2007-01.JPG

The fossil record of rodent-like mammals begins shortly after the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs 65 million years ago, as early as the Paleocene. Some molecular clock data, however, suggest modern rodents (members of the order Rodentia) already appeared in the late Cretaceous, although other molecular divergence estimations are in agreement with the fossil record.[18][19] By the end of the Eocene epoch, relatives of beavers, dormice, squirrels, and other groups appeared in the fossil record. They originated in Laurasia, the supercontinent composed of today's North America, Europe, and Asia. Some species colonized Africa, giving rise to the earliest hystricognaths. From Africa, hystricognaths rafted to South America, an isolated continent during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs. By the Miocene, Africa collided with Asia, allowing rodents such as porcupines to spread into Eurasia. During the Pliocene, rodent fossils appeared in Australia. Although marsupials are the most prominent mammals in Australia, rodents now make up almost 25% of the continent's mammal species. Meanwhile, the Americas became joined by the Isthmus of Panama, and some rodents participated in the resulting Great American Interchange; sigmodontines surged southward and caviomorphs headed north.

Some prehistoric rodents
Castoroides, a giant beaver
Ceratogaulus, a horned burrowing rodent
Spelaeomys, a rat that grew to a large size on the island of Flores
Giant hutias, a group of rodents once found in the West Indies
Ischyromys, a primitive, squirrel-like rodent
Leithia, a giant dormouse
Neochoerus pinckneyi, a large North American capybara that weighed 100 kg (220 lb)
Josephoartigasia monesi, the largest known rodent, with an estimated weight of very roughly 1,000 kg (2,200 lb)
Phoberomys pattersoni, the second-largest known rodent, with an estimated weight of 700 kg (1,500 lb)
Telicomys, another giant South American rodent


File:Rodent species pie chart.png

Standard classification

The rodents are part of the clades Glires (along with lagomorphs), Euarchontoglires (along with lagomorphs, primates, treeshrews, and colugos), and Boreoeutheria (along with most other placental mammals). The order Rodentia may be divided into suborders, infraorders, superfamilies and families.

Classification scheme:

ORDER RODENTIA (from Latin, rodere, to gnaw)

Alternative classifications

The above taxonomy uses the shape of the lower jaw (sciurognath or hystricognath) as the primary character. This is the most commonly used approach for dividing the order into suborders. Many older references emphasize the zygomasseteric system (suborders Protrogomorpha, Sciuromorpha, Hystricomorpha, and Myomorpha).

Several molecular phylogenetic studies have used gene sequences to determine the relationships among rodents, but these studies have yet to produce a single, consistent and well-supported taxonomy. Some clades have been consistently produced, such as:

The positions of the Castoridae, Geomyoidea, Anomaluridae, and Pedetidae are still being debated.

Monophyly or polyphyly?

In 1991, a paper submitted to Nature proposed that caviomorphs should be reclassified as a separate order (similar to Lagomorpha), based on an analysis of the amino acid sequences of guinea pig proteins.[20] This hypothesis was refined in a 1992 paper, which asserted the possibility that caviomorphs may have diverged from myomorphs prior to later divergences of Myomorpha; this would mean caviomorphs, or possibly hystricomorphs, would be moved out of the rodent classification into a separate order.[21] A minority scientific opinion briefly emerged arguing that guinea pigs, degus, and other caviomorphs are not rodents,[22][23] while several papers were put forward in support of rodent monophyly.[24][25][26] Subsequent studies published since 2002, using wider taxon and gene samples, have restored consensus among mammalian biologists that the order Rodentia is monophyletic.[27][28]


  1. ^ a b "rodent -". Retrieved 2007-11-03. 
  2. ^ "Rodents: Gnawing Animals". Retrieved 2007-11-03. 
  3. ^ Meerburg BG, Singleton GR, Leirs H (2009). "The Year of the Rat ends: time to fight hunger!". Pest Manag Sci. 65 (4): 351–2. PMID 19206089. doi:10.1002/ps.1718. 
  4. ^ Meerburg BG, Singleton GR, Kijlstra A (2009). "Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health". Crit Rev Microbiol. 35 (3): 221–70. PMID 19548807. doi:10.1080/10408410902989837. 
  5. ^ Myers, Phil (2000). "Rodentia". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 2006-05-25. 
  6. ^ David Lambert and the Diagram Group. The Field Guide to Prehistoric Life. New York: Facts on File Publications, 1985. ISBN 0-8160-1125-7
  7. ^ Harper, Douglas. [ rodent "rodent"] Check |url= value (help). Online Etymology Dictionary.  line feed character in |url= at position 33 (help)
  8. ^ Pearsall, J., ed. (2002). The Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 10th ed. rev. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 1,239. ISBN 0-19-860572-2. 
  9. ^ a b Esselstyn, J.A., Achmadi, A.S. and Rowe, K.C., (2012). Evolutionary novelty in a rat with no molars. Biology Letters, published online 22 August 2012. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0574 1744-957X
  10. ^ Hurst, J.L., (1999). Introduction to rodents. In: The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Vol. 1, Terrestrial Vertebrates, 7th edn. Ed. Poole, T., pp. 262–273. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
  11. ^ cite web |last=Myers first=P |year=2000 title=Rodentia (On-line) | |accessdate= }}
  12. ^ "Gnaw way! New species of long-nosed rat discovered that cannot chew". 2012-08-22. Retrieved 2012-09-13. 
  13. ^
  14. ^ Millien, Virginie (2008). "The largest among the smallest: the body mass of the giant rodent Josephoartigasia monesi". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275 (1646): 1953–1955. PMC 2596365Freely accessible. PMID 18495621. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0087. Retrieved 2008-05-27.  Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. ^ Rinderknecht, Andrés; Blanco, R. Ernesto (2008). "The largest fossil rodent" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275 (1637): 923–928. PMC 2599941Freely accessible. PMID 18198140. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1645. Retrieved 2008-05-27.  Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Cite uses deprecated parameter |coauthors= (help)
  16. ^ Wines, Michael (2004-05-19). "Gambian rodents risk death for bananas". The Age (The Age Company Ltd.). Retrieved 2006-05-25.  "A rat with a nose for landmines is doing its bit for humanity" Cited as coming from the New York Times in the article.
  17. ^ Sherwin, C.M., (2010). The Husbandry and Welfare of Non-traditional Laboratory Rodents. In “UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals”, R. Hubrecht and J. Kirkwood (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell. Chapter 25, pp. 359–369
  18. ^ Douzery, E.J.P., F. Delsuc, M.J. Stanhope, and D. Huchon (2003). "Local molecular clocks in three nuclear genes: divergence times for rodents and other mammals and incompatibility among fossil calibrations". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 57: S201–13. PMID 15008417. doi:10.1007/s00239-003-0028-x. 
  19. ^ Horner, D.S., K. Lefkimmiatis, A. Reyes, C. Gissi, C. Saccone, and G. Pesole (2007). "Phylogenetic analyses of complete mitochondrial genome sequences suggest a basal divergence of the enigmatic rodent Anomalurus". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7: 16. PMC 1802082Freely accessible. PMID 17288612. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-16. 
  20. ^ Graur, D.; Hide, W.; Li, W. (1991). "'Is the guinea-pig a rodent?'". Nature. 351 (6328): 649–652. PMID 2052090. doi:10.1038/351649a0. 
  21. ^ Li, W.; Hide, W.; Zharkikh, A.; Ma, D.; Graur, D. (1992). "'The molecular taxonomy and evolution of the guinea pig.'". Journal of Heredity. 83 (3): 174–81. PMID 1624762. 
  22. ^ D'Erchia, A.; Gissi, C.; Pesole, G.; Saccone, C.; Arnason, U. (1996). "'The guinea-pig is not a rodent.'". Nature. 381 (6583): 597–600. PMID 8637593. doi:10.1038/381597a0. 
  23. ^ Reyes, A.; Pesole, G.; Saccone, C. (2000). "'Long-branch attraction phenomenon and the impact of among-site rate variation on rodent phylogeny.'". Gene. 259 (1–2): 177–87. PMID 11163975. doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00438-8. 
  24. ^ Cao, Y.; Adachi, J.; Yano, T.; Hasegawa, M. (1994). "'Phylogenetic place of guinea pigs: No support of the rodent-polyphyly hypothesis from maximum-likelihood analyses of multiple protein sequences.'". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 11 (4): 593–604. PMID 8078399. 
  25. ^ Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. (1994). "'Mammalian phylogeny inferred from multiple protein data.'". Japanese Journal of Genetics. 69 (5): 555–66. PMID 7999372. doi:10.1266/jjg.69.555. 
  26. ^ Robinson-Rechavi, M.; Ponger, L.; Mouchiroud, D. (2000). "'Nuclear gene LCAT supports rodent monophyly.'". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 17 (9): 1410–1412. PMID 10960041. 
  27. ^ Lin, Y-H; McLenachan, PA; Gore, AR; Phillips, MJ; Ota, R; Hendy, MD; Penny, D (2002). "Four new mitochondrial genomes and the increased stability of evolutionary trees of mammals from improved taxon sampling". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19 (12): 2060–2070. PMID 12446798. 
  28. ^ Carleton, Michael D., and Musser, Guy G. "Order Rodentia". Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition, 2005, vol. 2, p. 745. (Concise overview of the literature)

Further reading

  • Adkins, RM; Gelke, R. M. E. L.; Rowe, D.; Honeycutt, R. L. (2001). "Molecular phylogeny and divergence time estimates for major rodent groups: Evidence from multiple genes". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 18 (5): 777–791. PMID 11319262.  Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  • Carleton, M. D. and G. G. Musser. 2005. "Order Rodentia," pp. 745–752 in Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • Leung, LKP; Cox, Peter G.; Jahn, Gary C.; Nugent, Robert (2002). "Evaluating rodent management with Cambodian rice farmers". Cambodian Journal of Agriculture. 5: 21–26. 
  • McKenna, Malcolm C., and Bell, Susan K. 1997. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp. ISBN 0-231-11013-8
  • Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World, Vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
  • Steppan, S. J.; Adkins, R. A.; Anderson, J. (2004). "Phylogeny and divergence date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes". Systematic Biology. 53 (4): 533–553. PMID 15371245. doi:10.1080/10635150490468701. 
  • University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP). 2007 "Rodentia". [1]
  • Wilson, D. E. and D. M. Reeder, eds. 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

External links

Zoology, osteology, comparative anatomy:

Various :


Template:Prehistoric rodents

Macropus eugenii 2 Gould This article is part of Project Mammal Orders, a All Birds project that aims to write comprehensive articles on each mammal order, including made-up orders.
Mammal Diversity 2011 This article is part of Project Mammal Taxonomy, a All Birds project that aims to write comprehensive articles on every order, family and other taxonomic rank related to mammals.

Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.