All Birds Wiki
Temporal range: Early Eocene – Recent
47–0 Ma
File:Brown boobytern .JPG
Brown Booby, Sula leucogaster
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Subclass: Neornithes
Infraclass: Neognathae
Superorder: Neoaves
Order: (see text)
Suborder: Sulae
Family: Sulidae
Reichenbach, 1849



Enkurosulidae Kashin, 1977
Pseudosulidae Harrison, 1975[2]

The bird family Sulidae comprises the gannets and boobies. Collectively called sulidas, they are medium-large coastal seabirds that plunge-dive for fish and similar prey. The ten species in this family are often considered congeneric in older sources, placing all in the genus Sula. However, Sula (true boobies) and Morus (gannets) can be readily distinguished by morphological and behavioral and DNA sequence characters. Abbott's Booby (Papasula) is given its own genus as it stands apart from both in these respects. It appears to be a distinct and ancient lineage, maybe closer to the gannets than to the true boobies.[3]


File:Northern Gannet 2006 2.jpg

Northern Gannet (Morus bassanus) preparing to land

Sulids measure about 60 to 85 cm (24 to 33 in) in length and have a wingspan of about 140 to 175 cm (4.59 to 5.74 ft). They have long, narrow and pointed wings, and a quite long, graduated and rather lozenge-shaped tail whose outer feathers are shorter than the central ones. Their flight muscles are rather small to allow for the small cross section required for plunge-diving, and thus their wing loading is high. Consequently, they are very streamlined, reducing drag, so their bodies are "torpedo-shaped" as well as somewhat flat.[4]

They have stout legs and webbed feet, with the web connecting all four toes. In some species the webs are brightly colored and used in courtship displays. The bill is usually conspicuously colored, long, deep at the base, and pointed, with saw-like edges. The upper mandible curves down slightly at the tip and can be moved upward to accept large prey. To keep water out during plunges, the nostrils enter into the bill rather than opening to the outside directly. The eyes are angled forward, and provide a wider field of binocular vision than in most other birds.[4]

The plumage is either all-white (or light brownish or greyish) with dark wingtips and (usually) tail, or at least some dark brown or black above with white underparts; gannets have a yellowish hue to the head. The face usually has some sort of black markings, typically on the lores. Unlike their relatives (the darters and cormorants), sulids have a well-developed preen gland whose waxy secretions they spread on their feathers for waterproofing and pest control. They moult their tail feathers irregularly and the flight feathers of their wings in stages, so that starting at the first moult, they always have some old feathers, some new ones, and some partly grown ones. Moult as a response to periods of stress has been recorded.[4]

Distribution and ecology[]

The sulids are distributed mainly in tropical and subtropical waters. Particularly gannets, however, are found in temperate regions too. These birds are not truly pelagic seabirds like the related Procellariiformes, and usually stay rather close to the coasts. But the abundant colonies of sulids that exist on many Pacific islands suggest that they are not infrequently blown away from their home range by storms, and can wander for long distances in search of a safe place to land if need be.[4]

All species feed entirely at sea, mostly on mid-sized fish and similarly-sized marine invertebrates (e.g. cephalopods). Many species feed communally, and some species follow fishing boats to scavenge discarded bycatch and chum. The typical hunting behavior is a dive from mid-air, taking the bird a meter or two under water. If prey manages to escape the diving birds at first, they may give chase using their legs and wings for underwater swimming.[4]

As noted above, the behavioral traits of gannets and boobies differ considerably, but the Sulidae as a whole are characterized by several behavioral synapomorphies: Before taking off, they will point the bill upwards (gannets) or forward (boobies). After landing again, they point downwards with the bill. And in response to a threat, they will not attack but shake their heads and point the bill towards the intruder.[5]

File:Nesting bluefoot.jpg

A Blue-footed Booby (Sula nebouxii) incubating its eggs


All sulids breed in colonies. Males examine the colony area in flight and then pick a nest site, which they defend by fighting and by territorial displays. Males then advertise to females by a special display and call. The display behaviour is characteristic, though not as diverse as the numerous variations found among the cormorants; it typically includes the male shaking its head. Females search the colony in flight and on foot for a mate. Once they select males, pairs maintain their bonds by preening each other and by frequent copulation.[6]

File:Abbotts Booby (Papasula abbotti) side on.jpg

Fledgling Abbott's Booby, still covered in nestling down

The clutch is typically 2 eggs. The eggs are unmarked (but may become stained by debris in the nest), whitish, pale blue, green or pink, and have a coating that resembles lime. Their[verification needed] weight ranges from 3.3 percent to 8 percent of the female's. Incubation lasts 42 to 55 days, depending on the species. Both sexes incubate; like their relatives they do not have brood patches, but their feet become vascularized and hot, and the birds place the eggs under the webs. Eggs lost during the first half of incubation are replaced.[4]

At hatching, parents move the eggs and then the hatchlings to the tops of their webs. The young hatch naked, but soon develop white down. They beg by touching the parent's bill and take regurgitated food straight from its gape. At first at least one parent is always in attendance of the altricial young; after two weeks, both parents leave the nest unguarded at times while they go fishing. The times for the chicks to fledge and to become independent of their parents depend greatly on the food supply. Rarely does more than one chick survive to maturity, except in the Peruvian Booby (Sula variegata) – which has the biggest clutch (two to four eggs) –, and less often in the Blue-footed Booby (S. nebouxii) . Siblicide by the stronger of two chicks is frequent.[4]

Systematics and evolution[]

Sulids are related to a number of other aquatic birds which all lack external nostrils and a brood patch, but have all four toes webbed and a gular sac. The closest living relatives of the Sulidae are the Phalacrocoracidae (cormorants and shags) and the Anhingidae (darters). The latter are somewhat intermediate between sulids and cormorants, but (like many cormorants) they are freshwater birds in a clade containing otherwise seabirds, and also symplesiomorphic with sulids but synapomorphic with cormorants in some other respects. Thus, the Sulidae seem to be the oldest and most distinct lineage of those three, which are united in a suborder Sulae. Therein, the Sulidae are typically placed simply as a family; sometimes a superfamily Suloidea is recognized, wherein some of the primitive prehistoric forms (e.g. Empheresula, Eostega and Masillastega) are placed as basal lineages distinct from the living Sulidae. However, the proposed family Pseudosulidae (or Enkurosulidae) is almost certainly invalid.[7]

The Sulae were traditionally included in the "Pelecaniformes" in its obsolete paraphyletic circumscription. But pelicans, the namesake family of the Pelecaniformes, are actually closer related to herons, ibises and spoonbills, the hamerkop and the shoebill than to the sulids and allies. In recognition of this, the Sulae have been proposed for separation in a new order Phalacrocoraciformes, which also includes the frigatebirds (Fregatidae) as well as one or more prehistoric lineages that are entirely extinct today.[8] The IOC World Bird List uses Suliformes as the proposed order name.[9]

There are three living genera. One is monotypic, another has but a few species, while the third contains about 65% of all living sulids:

Evolution and fossil genera[]

The fossil record of sulids is quite extensive due to the many Miocene/Pliocene forms that have been recovered. But the lineage of sulids extends back to the Eocene, and all things (such as the Early Eocene frigatebird Limnofregata) considered, the sulids seem to have diverged from the lineage leading to cormorants and darters around 50 million years ago (Ma), perhaps a bit earlier. The initial evolutionary radiation formed a number of genera which are now completely extinct, such as the freshwater Masillastega (which, as noted above, might not have been a modern-type sulid) or the bizarre Rhamphastosula (which had a bill shaped like an aracari's). The modern genera evolved (like many other living genera of birds) around the Oligocene-Miocene boundary about 23 Ma. Microsula, which lived during that time, seems to have been a primitive booby that still had many symplesiomorphies with gannets. Like the other Phalacrocoraciformes, the sulids originated probably in the general region of the Atlantic or western Tethys Sea – probably the latter rather than the former, given that their earliest fossils are abundant in Europe but absent from the well-studied contemporary American deposits.[10]

Prehistoric sulids (or suloids) only known from fossils are:

  • Masillastega (Early Eocene of Messel, Germany) – may belong in Eostega
  • Eostega (Late Eocene of Cluj-Manastur, Romania) – may include Masillastega
  • Sulidae gen. et sp. indet. (Thalberg Late Oligocene of Germany) – Empheresula?[11]
  • Sulidae gen. et sp. indet. (Late Oligocene of South Carolina, USA) – Microsula?[12]
  • Empheresula (Late Oligocene of Gannat, France – Middle Miocene of Steinheimer Becken, Germany) – including "Sula" arvernensis, "Parasula"[13]
  • Microsula (Late Oligocene of South Carolina, USA – Grund Middle Miocene of Austria) – may belong in Morus or Sula, includes "Sula" avita, "S." pygmaea, Enkurosula, "Pseudosula"[2]
  • Sarmatosula (Middle Miocene of Credinţa, Romania)
  • Miosula (Late Miocene of California)
  • Palaeosula (Early Pliocene? of California)
  • Rhamphastosula (Pisco Early Pliocene of SC Peru)
  • Sulidae gen. et sp. indet. (Late Pliocene of Valle di Fine, Italy) – Morus?[14]

For prehistoric species of the extant genera, see the genus articles.

The Early Oligocene Prophalacrocorax ronzoni of Ronzon (France) was variously placed in the seaduck genus Mergus, in Sula, and – after a distinct genus was established for it – in the Phalacrocoracidae. While it is quite likely to belong in the Sulae and may have been an ancient sulid (or suloid), of the three placements explicitly proposed none seems to be correct.[15]


  1. ^ Mlíkovský (2002): p.66
  2. ^ a b C.J.O. Harrison's Pseudosula of 1975 is a junior homonym of Pseudosula as established by Boetticher in 1955: Mlíkovský (2002: p.67)
  3. ^ Kennedy et al. (1996), Friesen et al. (2000)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Nelson (2003)
  5. ^ Kennedy et al. (1996)
  6. ^ Kennedy et al. (1996), Nelson (2003)
  7. ^ Olson (1985: p.204), Mlíkovský (2002: p.66), Christidis & Boles (2008: p.100), Mayr (2009)
  8. ^ Christidis & Boles (2008: p.100)
  9. ^
  10. ^ Olson (1985), Mayr (2009)
  11. ^ A distal humerus fragment; larger than Microsula: Göhlich (2003), Mayr (2009: p.65)
  12. ^ Some fossils that "do not differ substantially from modern [sulid] genera"; no further details given: Olson (1985: p.203)
  13. ^ C.J.O. Harrison's "Parasula" of 1975 is a junior homonym of Parasula as established by Mathews in 1913: Mlíkovský (2002: p.66)
  14. ^ A proximal humerus fragment somewhat similar to a gannet's: Lambrecht (1933: p.286)
  15. ^ Olson (1985: p.203), Mlíkovský (2002: p.264, 2007), Göhlich (2003), Mayr (2009: p.65)


  • Christidis, Les & Boles, Walter E. (2008): Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodVictoria, Australia. ISBN 9780643065116 Excerpt at Google Books
  • Friesen, V.L.; Anderson, D.J.; Steeves, T.E.; Jones, H. & Schreiber, E.A. (2002): Molecular Support for Species Status of the Nazca Booby (Sula granti). Auk 119(3): 820-826. [English with Spanish abstract] DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0820:MSFSSO]2.0.CO;2 PDF fulltext
  • Göhlich, Ursula B. (2003): The avifauna of the Grund Beds (Middle Miocene, Early Badenian, northern Austria). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien A 104: 237-249 [English with German abstract]. PDF fulltext
  • Kennedy, Martyn; Spencer, Hamish G. & Gray, Russell D. (1996): Hop, step and gape: do the social displays of the Pelecaniformes reflect phylogeny? Animal Behaviour 51(2): 273-291. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0028 (HTML abstract) Erratum: Animal Behaviour 51(5): 1197. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0124
  • Lambrecht, Kálmán (1933): Familia Sulidae. In: Handbuch der Palaeornithologie: 284-287 [German]. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin.
  • Mayr, Gerald (2009): 7.1.3 Sulidae (Gannets and Boobies). In: Paleogene Fossil Birds: 64-65. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg & New York. ISBN 3540896279 Excerpt at Google Books
  • Mlíkovský, Jirí (2002): Cenozoic Birds of the World (Part 1: Europe). Ninox Press, Prague. ISBN 80-901105-3-8 PDF fulltext
  • Mlíkovský, Jirí (2007): Taxonomic identity of Eostega lebedinskyi LAMBRECHT, 1929 (Aves) from the middle Eocene of Romania. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien A 109: 19-27 [English with German abstract]. PDF fulltext
  • Nelson, J. Bryan (2003): Gannets and Boobies. In: Perrins, C. (ed.): The Firefly Encyclopedia of Birds: 82–87. Firefly Books, Oxford.
  • Olson, Storrs L. (1985): Section X.G.5.a. Sulidae. In: The Fossil Record of Birds. Avian Biology 8: 203-204. PDF fulltext

External links[]


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Please help by writing it in the style of All Birds Wiki!